During my elementary, middle, and high school, a paper book and a blackboard are the only way to communicate between a teacher and a student and the only way to learn lots of areas and subjects. Nowadays, high tech devices cover both of them, a paper and a blackboard. I just wonder is this change really and truly good for students? I think the answer is “Depend on how to use these high tech devices for the classroom and what the purpose of these devices instead of old-fashioned materials. Defiantly, I agree that high tech is an excellent assistant to students and it is useful for attracting students’ interest. However, the purpose of school is not only to teach a curriculum but also to teach a social nature. I wonder that high tech devices are good for a social nature or not. Why don’t you read this article and think about this question from now.
Across America, the latest technologies are being stuffed into backpacks, propped up in classrooms and enabling learning across vast distances. While mobile and Internet technologies are often used to build classroom engagement at the grade school and high school levels, technology and educational experts say that things at the university level are quite different. In fact, technology may well eliminate the need for campuses altogether.
What does e-education look like?
- Top universities to offer online courses — for free.
- Virtual field trips for thousands of elementary school children in rural Minnesota.
- iMac computers for Chicago-area high school students and iPads for their counterparts in Indianapolis.
“It’s a significant change,” Karen Cator, the director of educational technology for the U.S. Education Department in Washington, D.C., told NBC News. “While we might feel like the Internet has been for around for a long time, which it has been, we just have to remember that it’s fairly new to us — and the opportunity to learn has exponentially grown.”
PBS / VeraQuest
Studies show educators are ready for a major change, particularly in accepting new technology into the classroom — or replacing the classroom entirely. K-12 teachers are striving to get their administrators on board with tablets and Web-based learning. Meanwhile, higher education sees the campus itself transitioning from an institution where students live for four years to a more familiar site they log into every day from home.
“We were ready to move ahead,” Rolly Landeros, chief information officer with Cathedral High School in Indianapolis, told NBC News. “We wanted our students become a part of the learning process for teachers.”
More than 900 Cathedral High School underclassman were required to purchase iPads for the 2012-2013 school year as part of the school’s upgrades to its wireless networks and classroom technology, he said. Students who couldn’t afford the $500 for an iPad were able to get discounts and scholarships to help pay for them, he said.
“When students use an iPad, they use it recreationally and socially, but teachers use iPads for their educational and professional use. We wanted both sides to use it in all worlds. Instead of teachers being afraid to ask for help, we now have students helping teachers be successful in the classroom,” he said.
Matt Rivera / NBC News
Last September, NBC News paid a visit to the Archibishop Mitty High School in San Jose, Calif., which is also piloting a one-iPad-per-child program. (See video below.) As the 2012-2013 school year kicks off, it too will be issuing iPads to its 1,600 students for use at school and at home.
But while change is happening in pockets across America, don’t expect an iPad revolution to occur occur overnight.
A PBS-funded VeraQuest survey of K-12 teachers found widespread agreement that technology was helpful in the classroom, making the teacher’s job easier and improving the students’ experience. But despite a prevalence of PCs, only 21 percent felt they had the right level of technology in the classroom. New and helpful technologies like electronic whiteboards and tablets are highly desired. And while teachers themselves often have access to helpful technology, the students rarely do.
PBS / VeraQuest
Naturally, cost was identified as the primary limiting factor, more than learning to use the new tools or any shortcomings in the tools themselves. And not surprisingly, teachers who taught in high-income areas found the administration, board and parents more supportive of technology.
In northern Minnesota, new technology will help level the playing field for schools in remote areas, said Matt Grose, chair of the Itasca Area Schools Collaborative and superintendent for the Deer River School District in Deer River, Minn.
The collaborative, which includes 20 schools and 6,000 students, is relying on new video technology to link classrooms with others throughout the region, he said. A $1 million federal grant helped pay for the distance-learning initiative, he said. The telepresence classrooms will be used for foreign language classes and field trips.
“Our kids are going to have opportunities to take higher level courses that we can’t offer here, or at least that we don’t have the enrollment to justify a teacher for,” he said.
He said the collaborative wants to expand the telepresence to the community, offering college courses for adults during the evenings.
Matt Rivera / NBC News
In the southwest suburb of Chicago, about 7,400 students returning to the Lincoln-Way Community High School District 210 will get new computers and updated computer labs. The district leased 700 new computers to update its 25 computer labs within its four high schools, district spokeswoman Charla Brautigam told The Chicago Tribune. Also, students in the district’s music and art programs will get new iMacs to use this 2012-2013 school year, she said.
Even assuming the presence of technology will increase with time, how it is applied is an important issue as well, educators say. Some argue that it isn’t helpful for children to have tablets if they’re just going to be watching lectures and slides on them. Frank Noschese, a science teacher at John Jay High School in New York, described the weakness of using technology as just another way to make students memorize and regurgitate information.
“I’m not against technology in the classroom, I’m against using technology as away to dispense information to students, for them to consume it and then spit back out,” he told NBC News in an earlier interview.
“I want to see students using technology to create knowledge for themselves. It’s not technology versus not technology, it’s about content delivery via lecture versus content delivery via exploration.”
Higher education at the Internet crossroads
At universities, the situation is more complicated. Although higher education is widely seen as a positive experience, the immense and growing cost of attending a university has combined with questions about the relevance of a degree, producing skepticism around the current method employed by schools. In particular, it is increasingly considered wasteful for students to live on campus, and for professors to deliver the same lectures in person, semester after semester.
In a survey conducted by Pew Research Center’s Internet & American Life Project, over a thousand experts weighed in on the topic of the future of higher learning. Pew asked them to side with one of two statements. One was a conservative view, saying higher education in 2020 would be largely the same, while integrating such technologies were a natural fit. The other was the more aggressive prediction that there would be major changes, a virtualization that puts distance learning and teleconferencing into widespread adoption.
The experts were split, but surprisingly there was little argument over whether universities would eventually change. Everyone seemed confident that education is in a period of transition. The disagreement was about the rate at which that change will occur.
According to the Pew report, P. F. Anderson, a librarian at the University of Michigan-Ann Arbor, put it as, “The very concept of what a university is, what academia is, what adult learning is, all of these are changing profoundly. If you think back to the original purposes of universities, what they have been doing recently has pivoted roughly 180 degrees.”
Yet changing the institution of higher education is like “turning an aircraft carrier,” another librarian, Richard Holeton of Stanford, told the research center. He said he believed eight or nine years will see some