It seems like I’ve been advocating for change in higher education for a long time now. In some of my presentations dating back 1990s and recent blogs include posts about a ‘futurisktic‘ perspectives, university for the 21st century (Duderstadt, 2001), a call for embracing the ‘conceptual age‘ (Pink, 2005) and more. As a strong advocate for change in higher education, I want to share an example of change for graduate education.
Last week (June 12-14), the VT Graduate School hosted a conference on creating a space and place for graduate education drawing upon the 13+ years of experience gained through the innovative Graduate Life Center (GLC) and the Transformative Graduate Education (TGE) initiative offered by the VT Graduate School. Graduate education colleagues and student affairs professionals attended the inaugural gathering to participate in the conversations about the “places, spaces, services and collaborations it takes to support the unique needs of graduate students”.
The conference was focused on the “what” and “how” of creating a space and place for graduate education. In my opening remarks, I focused on the “why” and the historical context that prompted the development of the GLC and the TGE programs. To begin….the call for change and the confluence of Duderstadt (2001) and Pink (2005).
In his book entitled “A University for the 21st Century, Duderstadt (2001) wrote that if lasting institutional reform is to be achieved, it will require changes in graduate education, with greater emphasis upon the integration of the disciplines and their applications to societal issues. Daniel Pink (2005) argued in his book “A whole New Mind” that society has moved from the agricultural age to the industrial age to the information age and for the 21st century, the conceptual age. Specifically, he wrote that “we are moving from an economy and a society built on the logical, linear, computer-like capabilities of the Information Age to an economy and a society built on the inventive, empathic, big-picture capabilities of what’s rising in its place, the Conceptual Age.”
Although other reports, books and professionals have called for change, Duderstadt and Pink were very influential in my rethinking and re-imagining graduate education and the leadership role that Graduate Schools could play. Graduate schools and graduate deans have and must accept the responsibility for creating a space and place for graduate education. This can be done physically regardless of the size of the space and can definitely be accomplished conceptually in building and growing academic community(ies). At their core and among the underlying principles, Graduate Schools and Graduate Deans must be responsive, integrative, interactive, inclusive & innovative. We (graduate deans) have the power to convene and we must be lead the transformation. The calls for change in graduate education are loud including the most recent document from National Academies of Science, Engineering and Mathematics (NASEM, May 2018) entitled Graduate STEM education for the 21st century. Although the report is focused on STEM, the recommendations are applicable to graduate education in general. We (Graduate Schools, Graduate Deans) have responsibility for change, must be strategic and lead the transformation.
Obviously there are differing perspectives and views of and from the different parts of the university not unlike the fable of the blind “men” and the elephant. Although many within the university community might want to see the Graduate School in a more traditional sense and less transformative, leaders needs to see things differently and look for that which is “unobvious” to others. Times have changed and we have the responsibility to create a new culture for graduate education by developing meaningful and relevant programs. In doing so, I found the following strategies to be useful:
- programs (e.g., workshops, classes) that provide added value (e.g., career development) to the degree
- programs and opportunities that compliment not duplicate departmental efforts
- incentives for participation including graduate certificates and academic credit
- resources need to be identified within Graduate School and utilized to offer programs and opportunities
- programs and opportunities should be innovative, dynamic and evolving and especially meaningful and relevant to current and future graduate students
- strong commitment from the Graduate Dean (e.g., advocate, champion for change)
The consensus study report (NASEM, 2018) indicates that “it would be wise to acknowledge and understand the current and future challenges facing this system (higher education) and take steps now to ensure that it remains vital, adaptable, and relevant for many generations to come. To neglect graduate education, or to ignore threats to its success, puts the economic, social, and cultural well-being of the nation at risk. (p. 19, 2018)
Graduate education needs to change and we can transform graduate education through by understanding cultural change and building a new culture with new traditions and expectations for graduate education for the 21st century. We don’t need to do this alone; we can develop partnerships and collaborations. The charge to graduate deans is to take the lead and the challenge to our student affairs colleagues is to join us. We can create a space and place for graduate education.