The following blog post is co-authored by –
Anaid Shaver, KJ Chew, Rifat Sabbir Mansur, Sam Salous, Zhenyu Yao (in alphabetical order).
The authors practiced a fast blogging technique to discuss a topic and write down the keynotes collaboratively under 30 mins.
“We did not know it was different from online teaching. We are not sure what digital pedagogy is.”
These were some of the opening statements we had in the group. Our discussion revolved around interpreting what “digital pedagogy” is.
For some of us, digital pedagogy is not a thing that you do, it is a “force” that exists that has multiple elements. For instance, when we talk about Kahoot, it is not a digital pedagogy. It is deeper than that. It is its own force in itself and it invites learning in the process. It is also always evolving. The use of “hacking” as a form of manifestation of learning also supports the idea of what digital pedagogy can be. For others, some view digital pedagogy as a study and a philosophy, indicating that one needs to spend years and effort learning it. An instructor needs some training before he/she is assigned to teach a course. Similarly, one becomes a digital pedagogue by spending years researching, participating, writing, and presenting on digital pedagogies. The most important factor in teaching is that it is still a human endeavor rather than just based on the technologies.
However, what makes it “digital”? For some of us, we think some of the authors have “digital” as a conversation starter. They do not want to restrict the conversations, mindsets, and definitions of what “digital” is. They want us to break out the restrictive thinking and mindsets revolving around LMS and digital teaching. This means digital pedagogy does not mean it has to be in a virtual setting. It also does not have to be using digital tools. It is a way we can facilitate learning better in creative, flexible, and expansive ways.
On the issues of banning digital tools or technologies in the class, we think student agency is important, and we should be teaching students how to use the tools, like laptops. Instead of discussing with them using laptops for social media, we can have discussions with them on how to use laptops for learning. For instance, one of our group members provides them links to look for using their laptops to learn about critical thinking. The instructors should focus on how to make their class materials more interesting. Especially, at the college level where teaching is not a form of babysitting. It might be helpful to develop more flexible teaching approaches, such as recorded lectures, where students can follow through according to their own convenience. The key aspect here is that teaching should excite students into being curious and learning more.
Thank you for reading our discussion blog.
Have a wonderful day.