Here’s another interesting article I found from The Chronicle of Higher Education on how to host a website on Google Drive. The article says that even though cloud technology, such as Google Drive, is not always reliable or secure, this provides a fast and easy option to publish your website without paying for hosting.

The Uchek app lets users take urine samples with their smartphones. (Credit: Uchek)

Here’s an interesting article I found while browsing through the news today. A urine sample app developed by a MIT entrepreneur lets users detect diseases with iPhones. Yes, it can potentially cost $20.99 but it’s saves people a trip to the doctors and lets them test for up to 25 diseases in the comforts of their homes.

In relations to the conversation from yesterday’s class, hopefully, paying the price of $29.99 will ensure users privacy and control over their information on this App.

Upon completing my Online Identity Analysis paper, I have realized that I do not have much of a “professional” online persona. Yes, I do have a LinkedIn but this seems like the bare minimum after following seniors in the field for a few weeks. Even thought I have a professional website from my undergrad, I now realize the importance of having an up-to-date site, which makes me want to make one very badly. This is one of my many moments where I think to myself, “Jeez, I need to listen to my adviser more!”

Although many people would agree that we dictate the content of our online profiles through the information that we reveal on our bios, the friends we add, and the statuses that we post, “Social Network Sites as Networked Publics” by danah boyd brings our attention to the reality that we do not have full rein on our online profiles, such as Facebook.

Putting aside technicalities, it is difficult and tedious to control and tailor our profiles to make them appropriate to all of our “friends” let alone our secondary, unintended, and invisible audiences. We also cannot control the wall posts and pictures that we are tagged in, even though we can delete posts and ask the original poster to remove tags. If we have high privacy settings and require all tags to be approved, these pictures are still available on the Internet without our permission and can be traced back to us.

We also cannot always control who sees our profile and its contents. Even with high privacy settings, friends of friends can see our posts, tags, and pictures. Disabling this feature in a way defeats a major purpose of social networking– sharing our lives with an audience. Future employers also have access to our “private” information, which many of us forget.

The lack of social, spatial, and temporal boundaries make way for collapsed texts, which makes it easy for people, such as employers, to take information out of context. This can be detrimental in many ways as messages and comments can be misinterpreted in unintended ways. Anachronistic communication also contributes to this problem as conversations can be drawn out for extended periods of time, which makes it likely that the audience, intended or not, only sees pieces of an ongoing conversation, which can result in them “seeing the wrong things at the wrong time.”

Overall, this article brought my attention to the extent of which our friends and peers contribute to our overall digital identities. This combined with the blurring of the public and private makes it necessary for us to be hyper aware of potential contributors to our online identities, and conversely, think of the various groups of audiences of our social profiles so that we are not caught off guard in crucial moments, such as during our job hunt.

Why death is not the end of your social media life introduces an app that allows “you” to update your Twitter from beyond the grave. This app uses algorithms to extract your writing style and interests and essentially creates a primitive rendition your thought process;  then, this app Tweets and posts from your account, which is supposed to help loved ones cope with your passing. Interesting, yet freaky and unnatural.

The next article, Sealed with a Thumb-Kiss? introduces social networking apps on the market that exist to give your technology-mediated relationships a personal touch, to help kindle your love life, or even connect with friends. Some of the apps mentioned include Avocado (for sharing calendars and agendas, compiling photos, and sharing thumb “hugs”),  Duet (for proposing activities to your lover and friends– more personal than a chat because you make requests using video. This app claims to store your cherished memories forever), and Couple (a combo of Snapchat and texting). All of the descriptions for the apps on iTunes emphasize their ability to help you connect with your loved ones on a deeper level, through your phone.

Although it is nice that, with these apps, couples can show affection to one another without encroaching on public spaces of the online world, such as Facebook and Instagram. Allowing users to incorporate visuals may even help them feel closer to the ones they are communicating with, but I am not completely sold on the effectiveness of these apps. Simultaneously, I can see their appeal, especially for couples in long distance relationships.

Overall, these apps are all attempting to fill voids created by physical space, large or small. They really make you realize how important it is to enjoy and cherish the face-to-face time with your significant other because no technology can recreate the “real thing.” At the same time, because we’re not joined at the hip with our loved ones, these apps may make the technology-mediated interactions more personal and meaningful.

About me

My name is Sanglin Lee and I am a first year masters student in English at Virginia Tech. Although my academic background is in English, which many people seem to associate with being technologically challenged, my personal relationships and academic interests in professional writing have exposed me to a wide array of technologies. This has led me to change my digital identity from a tech-savvy digital immigrant to a born again digital native.

Hardware

My MacBook, iPad, and iPhone are at the center of my life. I use them to do everything from getting news and watching TV to doing homework and creating lesson plans for my freshman composition class. I have at least one of these devices within reach at any given moment in the day. This gives me the power to stay connected with my networks and allows me to access any information and entertainment I need, wherever I go.

Software

Prezies are the main teaching tool I use as a freshman composition instructor. I consider them to be a more engaging and effective teaching tool than PowerPoint, solely based on my personal experiences. Prezi has also showed me the convenience of cloud technology as it allowed me to access and project my teaching materials using another computer when I left my the VGA adapter at home.

I also use programs in Adobe Creative Suite (PhotoShop, InDesign, and Illustrator) and Microsoft Office regularly as a writer for Virginia Tech’s Department of Building Construction. Microsoft Publisher is on my list of programs I hope to master in the future.

My limited knowledge of HTML and CSS allowed me to format and publish an article online called ‘Trees and Water’ that I wrote for print during my internship at the Virginia Water Resources Center. My knowledge of HTML and CSS was also enough to create my own personal website as an undergrad. I hope to continue honing and expanding my computer skills during my free time.

Dream set up

Although my 3G network has been a lifesaver on the road and in my own home, during the many internet outages, I would like to have a constant, reliable, and fast connection to the web everywhere I go. I would also love a device that is small enough to carry around everywhere, like my phone, but is as convenient to work on as my laptop.

I have tried taking notes on my phone and have experimented with many reminder and list making apps but have not found one that works with my lifestyle of organized chaos. Many days, I wish that one of my devices could read my mind, take notes, and organize them rather than me scribbling them down on random scraps of paper.

Research for The Digital Self Online Identity Analysis project brings concreteness to the warning, “everything you post online lasts forever.”  Having the ability to trace back multiple years worth of Tweets to see who said what, when, and to whom with a single click is fascinating, yet terrifying.

Tools such as All My Tweets and Twitter Archiving Google Spreadsheet, aka TAGS has allowed me to locate and analyze the Twitter activity of two professionals in the rhetoric and writing field for the last three years. These programs have given me information on each person’s top Tweeters and virtually link me to everyone in each of the two professional’s Twitter networks. The programs have expedited my data mining process, yet, it is disconcerting that everyone has such easy access to this information. Moreover, it is a bit disturbing that the people whose activities we track and examine have no idea of what is going on.

This leads to the question, whose privacy is more important: the person publishing the information, often for a private audience, or those who are seeking out and surveying other people’s online activities? Is there a mutual understanding between the two parties that those posting things online accept that everything they post can fall into the hands of an unintended audience and those who mine agree not to use the information maliciously? Then, what happens when there is a breach in trust?

I do not think there is much harm in people having access to online information that is posted on the web. Simultaneously, the reality that our privacy and the absence of separation between our private and professional lives are at stake is unsettling. Are people entitled to knowing what and how much other people know about them or is ignorance bliss in this situation?

I was impatiently waiting for responses from my students. I assumed that at least a few of them would reply to my emails answering their questions and providing feedback on their first major assignment. Being on Prezi, a site that apparently allows me to edit my presentations without being connected, and having my computer on mute kept me from noticing, for a long time, that the internet service had crashed, again.

In a digital age where the internet is somewhat of an umbilical cord for digital natives and immigrants alike, it is unacceptable that the internet goes out as often as a few times a day, especially in a college town. My frustrations with my internet provider has been growing as losing internet inhibits me from completing homework assignments for my own classes as well as preparing lesson plans for the class that I teach.

This experience makes me wonder, in a world where we expect people to be connected at all times, is “sorry my Internet was down” an acceptable excuse for anyone? If it is not, is it fair to give unreliable internet providers a monopoly over an area? I am sitting here, in front of my computer, reminiscing the few late-night phone calls I have made to the company in the past few years and the absurdity of the conversations make me laugh.

I wonder, does this happen because we are in a relatively rural area? How would people in NYC or Northern Virginia respond if this should happen to them? Am I exaggerating when I say that I feel like my world stops spinning once the internet shuts off? Am I an ingrate and a brat for feeling this way? I am trying to think of simpler time where I couldn’t get on the web whenever I needed to and I can’t, probably because that memory does not exist.

I am eager to see whether this experience is something that I will cherish as a piece of history that others will fantasize about in a few years or whether it is  a nuisance that I will never have to think about in the future.

In moments like this, I am beyond grateful that my phone has the capability of connecting me to the web, which leads me to the epiphany of why it is desirable for phones to have big screens.