In The Absence of Stalin

As Stalin lay dying in Moscow due to internal hemorrhaging in March of 1953, the world was changing. The Presidium of the USSR was planning it’s next step. Since Lenin had died, Stalin had run the show and anyone who had gotten in his was had been removed or run over. What would they do without him? How would they handle this vacuum of power? Would they separate his job into more specialized positions, or would they leave his legacy in tact?

Eventually, the Presidium came to the conclusion that three men should fulfill their passing leaders position, and interestingly enough, all three of the men selected had fallen out of Stalin’s favor. These three were Georgii Malenkov, Lavrentii Beria, and Nikita Khrushchev. Each taking part in what was referred to as a “collective leadership” would bring about many changes in the Soviet way, at least until they were ousted or executed by another.

More importantly though, Josef Stalin was dying and all of Moscow, and most of the USSR was… mourning? This man had held the helm, during some of the most cruel and logistically fueled times in human history and had encouraged more than one massacre himself. Under his rule, for a good period of time might I add, basically random executions were taking place, just to keep the people on their toes. He approved of the extremely dysfunctional collective farm idea, and encouraged it’s implication strongly. He “may have” intentionally caused one of the worst famines in Eastern European history just to wipe out tons of people and reenforce Soviet rule.  Yet, when this man is dies, thousands of people flock to see him one last time before he is entombed beside Lenin? Yes, Stalin did a great deal of good for the people, but at what price did that good come? Did he really better the lives of these people? Did his actions actually save lives, and improve the nation? Many of his actions easily fall under the definition of Crimes Against Humanity, and that’s no small feat. Yet, the people loved him. He led them headfirst into some rocky seas, but he brought them through. He made many sacrifices in a cold and calculated manner, but in doing so he preserved the people as a whole.

Joseph Stalin

Stalin was the face of an Empire, and was the symbol of an Era in Soviet history. On March 4, 1953 that Era passed away as Stalin was entombed and the three new leaders took their spots in the Soviet nation, and history atop the country Stalin had made. These three had some mighty big shoes to fill, and the world was watching.

2 thoughts on “In The Absence of Stalin

  1. You ask some very good questions in this post. I think the Soviet people looked up to Stalin because he was there every step of the way to lead them through World War II. Fear I’m sure also played a huge role in the people at least respecting him and his dictatorship.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.